Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Instant
Claude Fable 5.1 
GPT-5.5 Instant Verdict
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) leads on quality: 70.3 vs 60.5.
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- GPT-5.5 Instant is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following, long context, multimodal.
- GPT-5.5 Instant is 1.8× cheaper ($11.25 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
- GPT-5.5 Instant streams 3.2× faster (129 vs 40 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 (max) | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.3 | 60.5 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.4 | 70.7 |
| Coding score | 78.4 | 61.1 |
| Composite score | 76.6 | 62.9 |
| Human preference score | 71.3 | 67.5 |
| Knowledge score | 75.9 | 69.4 |
| Maths score | 77.0 | 42.5 |
| Reasoning score | 71.9 | 62.6 |
| Instruction following score | – | 69.8 |
| Long context score | – | 61.4 |
| Multimodal score | – | 59.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $11.25 |
| Output speed | 40 tok/s | 129 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 299.8 s | 16.8 s |
| Context window | 1M | 400k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 82.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 90.2% | 26.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 68.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 57.9% | – |
| SciCode | 62.0% | 48.6% |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 142.5 |
| LMArena Text | 1504 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1522 | 1491 |
| LMArena Coding | 1517 | 1514 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1764 | – |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1251 |
| LMArena Agent | 14.5 | – |
| LiveBench | 83.4% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 86.4% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 66.1% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 97.0% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 80.3% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 89.5% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 26.8 |
| IFBench | – | 71.5% |
| AA-LCR | – | 70.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 11.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 42.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 84.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 21.6% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 52.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 49.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.0% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Instant: questions
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than GPT-5.5 Instant?
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) leads on quality: 70.3 vs 60.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5.1 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than GPT-5.5 Instant for coding?
- Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in coding (78 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than GPT-5.5 Instant for agentic tasks?
- GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in agentic tasks (71 vs 67 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.5 Instant?
- GPT-5.5 Instant is cheaper: $11.25 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-5.5 Instant?
- GPT-5.5 Instant streams faster: 129 against 40 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Claude Fable 5.1 accepts more context: 1M against 400k tokens.