Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.1 Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.2.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is 3.0× cheaper ($10.00 vs $30.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Opus 4.7 streams 4.3× faster (43 vs 10 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.1 (thinking) | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 58.2 | 65.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 63.6 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 53.3 | 64.8 |
| Composite score | 57.9 | 80.4 |
| Human preference score | 64.6 | 69.1 |
| Instruction following score | 52.6 | 58.7 |
| Knowledge score | 58.3 | 66.5 |
| Long context score | 64.5 | 65.9 |
| Maths score | 59.3 | 65.4 |
| Multimodal score | 56.5 | 65.7 |
| Reasoning score | 65.6 | 66.6 |
| Blended price $/M | $30.00 | $10.00 |
| Output speed | 10 tok/s | 43 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 3.2 s | 21.7 s |
| Context window | 200k | 1M |
| Humanity's Last Exam | – | 36.2% |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 80.2% |
| SimpleBench | – | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | – | 76.4% |
| FrontierCode | – | 38.5% |
| GSO-Bench | – | 44.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 156.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1495 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1480 | 1519 |
| LMArena Coding | 1512 | 1547 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1557 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1317 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 22.9 | 40.7 |
| IFBench | 55.4% | 58.6% |
| AA-LCR | 76.0% | 78.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 67.9% | 78.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 27.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 34.3% | 51.5% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 80.9% | 91.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 12.5% | 42.3% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 71.4% | 88.6% |
| AIME (Vals) | 78.2% | 96.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 66.5% | 85.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.9% | 89.9% |
| IOI | – | 47.1% |
| LegalBench | – | 85.3% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.1% |
| TaxEval | 73.7% | 75.3% |
| MedQA | 93.6% | – |
| MGSM | 94.4% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 68.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 82.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 76.3% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 56.1 |
| MultiChallenge | 57.2% | – |
| VISTA | 48.4% | – |
| MultiNRC | 38.4% | – |
| HiL-Bench | – | 41.7% |
| TutorBench | 50.8% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1311 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | – | 73.3% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.7: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Claude Opus 4.7?
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.7 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Claude Opus 4.7 for coding?
- Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in coding (65 vs 53 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Claude Opus 4.7 for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 64 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Opus 4.7?
- Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper: $10.00 against $30.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.1 or Claude Opus 4.7?
- Claude Opus 4.7 streams faster: 43 against 10 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M against 200k tokens.