Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mimo v2 Pro
Claude Opus 4.5 
Mimo v2 Pro Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) and Mimo v2 Pro are level on quality (60.7 vs 60.6).
- Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, long context, maths, multimodal.
- Mimo v2 Pro is stronger in instruction following, knowledge, reasoning, human preference.
- Mimo v2 Pro is 3.3× cheaper ($3.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) | Mimo v2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.7 | 60.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.6 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 56.4 | 54.7 |
| Composite score | 65.8 | 65.2 |
| Instruction following score | 54.8 | 67.5 |
| Knowledge score | 61.0 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 65.2 | 60.5 |
| Maths score | 64.0 | – |
| Multimodal score | 58.0 | – |
| Reasoning score | 58.6 | 65.2 |
| Human preference score | – | 64.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 45 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 17.3 s | – |
| Context window | 200k | 1.0M |
| LMArena Text | – | 1448 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1476 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1433 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 29.1 | 28.6 |
| IFBench | 58.0% | 68.8% |
| AA-LCR | 77.3% | 68.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 74.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 14 | 4.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 47.0% | 40.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 86.6% | 87.0% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 30.1% | 30.4% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 89.5% | 95.0% |
| AIME (Vals) | 95.4% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 83.7% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| IOI | 20.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.6% | – |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 74.9% | – |
| MedQA | 95.9% | – |
| MGSM | 95.2% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 76.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 85.9% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 59.0% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 46.2% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 44.2% | – |
| VISTA | 46.4% | – |
| MultiNRC | 48.6% | – |
| TutorBench | 51.2% | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.2% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 80.0% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mimo v2 Pro: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Mimo v2 Pro?
- Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) and Mimo v2 Pro are level on quality (60.7 vs 60.6). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Mimo v2 Pro for coding?
- Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher in coding (56 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Mimo v2 Pro for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (75 vs 69 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mimo v2 Pro?
- Mimo v2 Pro is cheaper: $3.00 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Mimo v2 Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 200k tokens.