Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Claude Opus 4.5 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 60.7.
- Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, maths.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in coding, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning, human preference.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is 5.0× cheaper ($2.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 4.3× faster (194 vs 45 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (thinking) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.7 | 65.0 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.6 | 62.7 |
| Coding score | 56.4 | 68.1 |
| Composite score | 65.8 | 72.3 |
| Instruction following score | 54.8 | 77.8 |
| Knowledge score | 61.0 | 73.2 |
| Long context score | 65.2 | 65.4 |
| Maths score | 64.0 | 52.2 |
| Multimodal score | 58.0 | 65.0 |
| Reasoning score | 58.6 | 69.2 |
| Human preference score | – | 66.3 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 45 tok/s | 194 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 17.3 s | 2.6 s |
| Context window | 200k | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 57.8% |
| SciCode | – | 58.2% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 41.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 39.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 154.6 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1492 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1511 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1541 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1293 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -2.6 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 29.1 | 34.3 |
| IFBench | 58.0% | – |
| AA-LCR | 77.3% | 77.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 74.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 14 | 28.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 47.0% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 86.6% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 30.1% | 46.2% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 58.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 89.5% | – |
| AIME (Vals) | 95.4% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 83.7% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| IOI | 20.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.6% | – |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 74.9% | – |
| MedQA | 95.9% | – |
| MGSM | 95.2% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 76.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 85.9% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | 59.0% | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | 46.2% | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | 44.2% | 57.0% |
| VISTA | 46.4% | – |
| MultiNRC | 48.6% | 65.6% |
| TutorBench | 51.2% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1260 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.2% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 80.0% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 60.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in coding (68 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (75 vs 63 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper: $2.00 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 45 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 200k tokens.