Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mimo v2 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 
Mimo v2 Pro Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.6 leads on quality: 63.3 vs 60.6.
- Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal.
- Mimo v2 Pro is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following, reasoning.
- Mimo v2 Pro is 3.3× cheaper ($3.00 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | Mimo v2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.3 | 60.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 68.8 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 62.4 | 54.7 |
| Composite score | 69.4 | 65.2 |
| Human preference score | 64.9 | 64.5 |
| Instruction following score | 53.9 | 67.5 |
| Knowledge score | 70.6 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 60.5 |
| Maths score | 65.7 | – |
| Multimodal score | 63.6 | – |
| Reasoning score | 62.6 | 65.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 36 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 2.4 s | – |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 94.4% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 78.7% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.0% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 79.8% | – |
| SimpleBench | 67.6% | – |
| Cybench | 93.0% | – |
| Remote Labor Index | 4.2% | – |
| WeirdML | 77.9% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 32.4% | – |
| FrontierCode | 26.6% | – |
| GSO-Bench | 33.3% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.3 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1498 | 1448 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1527 | 1476 |
| LMArena Coding | 1546 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1537 | 1433 |
| LMArena Vision | 1311 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.9 | 28.6 |
| IFBench | 53.1% | 68.8% |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 68.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 75.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 13.7 | 4.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 48.5% | 40.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 89.6% | 87.0% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.9% | 30.4% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 92.1% | 95.0% |
| HiL-Bench | 38.3% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1223 | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.4% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.6% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold) | 75.6% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mimo v2 Pro: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Mimo v2 Pro?
- Claude Opus 4.6 leads on quality: 63.3 vs 60.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Mimo v2 Pro for coding?
- Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher in coding (62 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 4.6 better than Mimo v2 Pro for agentic tasks?
- Mimo v2 Pro scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 69 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Mimo v2 Pro?
- Mimo v2 Pro is cheaper: $3.00 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Mimo v2 Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.