Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 
Gemini 3 Pro Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.7.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths.
- Gemini 3 Pro is stronger in instruction following, reasoning.
- Gemini 3 Pro is 2.2× cheaper ($4.50 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 61.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.4 | 62.3 |
| Coding score | 64.8 | 58.9 |
| Composite score | 80.4 | 64.3 |
| Human preference score | 69.1 | 69.0 |
| Instruction following score | 58.7 | 64.3 |
| Knowledge score | 66.5 | 60.9 |
| Long context score | 65.9 | 64.5 |
| Maths score | 65.4 | 48.4 |
| Multimodal score | 65.7 | 65.7 |
| Reasoning score | 66.6 | 67.1 |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $4.50 |
| Output speed | 43 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 21.7 s | – |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 92.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 72.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | 37.5% |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | 69.4% |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | 76.4% |
| GDPval | – | 40.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | – | 1.3% |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | 69.9% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 31.5% |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 20.0% |
| GSO-Bench | 44.1% | 18.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.3 | 153.0 |
| LMArena Text | 1495 | 1486 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1519 | 1504 |
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | 1518 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | 1439 |
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | 1305 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 40.7 | 28.0 |
| IFBench | 58.6% | 70.4% |
| AA-LCR | 78.7% | 76.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 78.8% | 80.2% |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.3 | 15.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 51.5% | 41.7% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.4% | 90.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 39.7% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 88.6% | 87.1% |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.3% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 85.1% | 86.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 89.9% | 90.1% |
| IOI | 47.1% | – |
| LegalBench | 85.3% | – |
| CorpFin | 66.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 75.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | – |
| Vals Index | 56.1 | – |
| AIME 2026 | – | 91.7% |
| HMMT February 2026 | – | 86.4% |
| MathArena Apex | – | 23.4% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 43.3% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 70.3% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 65.7% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 39.2% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 40.6% |
| VISTA | – | 51.5% |
| MultiNRC | – | 59.0% |
| HiL-Bench | 41.7% | – |
| TutorBench | – | 53.7% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | – |
| MMMU-Pro (official) | – | 81.0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.3% | 80.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | – | 74.2% |
| SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold) | – | 77.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | – | 75.0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | – | 54.0% |
| BFCL Overall | – | 72.5% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3 Pro: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 3 Pro?
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.7 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 3 Pro for coding?
- Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in coding (65 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 3 Pro for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3 Pro?
- Gemini 3 Pro is cheaper: $4.50 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.