BenchLeader

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 8

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 8 (max) are level on quality (64.7 vs 63.9).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge.
  • Qwen3 8 (max) is stronger in coding, human preference, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Qwen3 8 (max) is 3.8× cheaper ($2.67 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
  • Claude Opus 4.8 streams 1.5× faster (58 vs 39 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 8 (max)
BenchLeader Index64.763.9
Agents & tools score65.056.1
Coding score65.771.7
Composite score81.970.8
Human preference score65.667.9
Instruction following score61.6
Knowledge score66.362.3
Long context score65.365.7
Multimodal score64.467.2
Reasoning score64.267.7
Blended price $/M$10.00$2.67
Output speed58 tok/s39 tok/s
Time to first answer29.5 s53.2 s
Context window1M1M
SimpleBench64.8%
Remote Labor Index8.3%
FrontierCode46.5%
GSO-Bench47.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.3156.6
LMArena Text14731480
LMArena Hard Prompts15031502
LMArena Coding15271520
LMArena WebDev15401685
LMArena Vision12891313
LMArena Agent3.9
LiveBench78.5%
LiveBench Reasoning88.2%
LiveBench Coding72.9%
LiveBench Agentic Coding64.7%
LiveBench Mathematics91.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.4%
LiveBench Language79.7%
AA Intelligence Index42.040.3
IFBench62.2%
AA-LCR77.7%78.3%
MMMU-Pro82.3%
AA-Omniscience28.83.4
Terminal-Bench Hard58.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.0%92.7%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)48.7%43.0%
SciCode (AA)54.4%53.2%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)94.4%
LiveCodeBench87.8%87.8%
MMLU-Pro89.6%88.6%
IOI73.0%
LegalBench83.6%83.6%
CorpFin66.7%65.8%
TaxEval75.6%75.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)71.9%67.4%
SWE-bench (Vals)88.6%85.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)92.4%93.7%
Vals Index60.951.8
HiL-Bench35.3%
EQ-Bench 41281

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.