Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 7
Claude Sonnet 5 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Claude Sonnet 5 (high) and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (61.4 vs 61.3).
- Claude Sonnet 5 (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, multimodal.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in knowledge, long context, instruction following, maths.
- They cost about the same ($3.75 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3 7 (max) streams 2.8× faster (169 vs 60 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (high) | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.4 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 61.8 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 61.6 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 69.5 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 66.2 | 57.2 |
| Knowledge score | 62.4 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 64.8 | 66.0 |
| Multimodal score | 63.1 | – |
| Reasoning score | 66.8 | 66.8 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.6 |
| Maths score | – | 57.4 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 60 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 10.0 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | 48.6% | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 68.8% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1462 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1490 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1521 | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1538 | 1517 |
| LMArena Vision | 1278 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 6.3 | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 32.0 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 76.7% | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | -3.7 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 35.7% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 54.3% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| IOI | – | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3 7?
- Claude Sonnet 5 (high) and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (61.4 vs 61.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Sonnet 5 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in coding (62 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Claude Sonnet 5 better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Claude Sonnet 5 scores higher in agentic tasks (62 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 is cheaper: $3.75 against $4.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 streams faster: 169 against 60 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1M tokens of context.