Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 8
Gemini 3.6 Flash 
Qwen3 8 Verdict
- Qwen3 8 (max) leads on quality: 63.6 vs 60.8.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3 8 (max) is stronger in coding, maths, agents & tools, human preference, reasoning.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is 1.8× cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.67 per 1M blended).
- Gemini 3.6 Flash streams 5.1× faster (194 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Qwen3 8 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.8 | 63.6 |
| Coding score | 49.8 | 69.7 |
| Composite score | 72.4 | 70.9 |
| Knowledge score | 74.7 | 62.3 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 65.7 |
| Maths score | 54.8 | 62.4 |
| Multimodal score | 67.8 | 67.2 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 56.0 |
| Human preference score | – | 68.3 |
| Reasoning score | – | 68.1 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.50 | $2.67 |
| Output speed | 194 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 16.8 s | 55.3 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| SciCode | – | 52.9% |
| FrontierCode | 34.4% | – |
| ProofBench | 36.0% | 58.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.3 | 156.6 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1480 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1502 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1520 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1670 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1313 |
| LMArena Agent | – | 3.9 |
| LiveBench | – | 78.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 88.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 64.7% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 91.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 78.4% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.3 | 40.3 |
| AA-LCR | 80.0% | 78.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 83.2% | 82.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 22.1 | 3.4 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.8% | 92.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.8% | 43.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | 53.4% | 53.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.6% |
| IOI | – | 73.0% |
| LegalBench | – | 83.6% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.8% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.5% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.4% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 85.6% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 93.7% |
| Vals Index | – | 51.8 |
| AIME 2026 | 96.7% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 89.4% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 26.0% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3 8: questions
- Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Qwen3 8?
- Qwen3 8 (max) leads on quality: 63.6 vs 60.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3 8 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Qwen3 8 for coding?
- Qwen3 8 scores higher in coding (70 vs 50 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 8?
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 against $2.67 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3 8?
- Gemini 3.6 Flash streams faster: 194 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.