BenchLeader

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5 Pro

Verdict
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) leads on quality: 64.5 vs 60.8.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is 28× cheaper ($1.50 vs $41.25 per 1M blended).
MetricGemini 3.7 Flash (medium)GPT-5 Pro
BenchLeader Index64.560.8
Coding score68.5
Composite score79.1
Knowledge score75.468.0
Long context score68.1
Multimodal score69.467.4
Reasoning score63.557.6
Blended price $/M$1.50$41.25
Output speed272 tok/s
Time to first answer4.6 s
Context window1M400k
Humanity's Last Exam31.6%
SimpleBench61.6%
SciCode57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.3
AA Intelligence Index39.6
AA-LCR83.0%
MMMU-Pro84.7%
AA-Omniscience23.7
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.1%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)39.0%
SciCode (AA)59.8%
PRBench Finance51.1%
PRBench Legal49.9%
VISTA52.4%
MultiNRC65.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark76.8%
ARC-AGI-191.2%70.2%
ARC-AGI-263.8%18.3%

Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5 Pro: questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GPT-5 Pro?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) leads on quality: 64.5 vs 60.8. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5 Pro?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 against $41.25 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 400k tokens.