Gemini 3 Pro vs Muse Spark
Verdict
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.7.
- Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
| Metric | Gemini 3 Pro | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.7 | 65.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 62.3 | 66.4 |
| Coding score | 58.9 | 66.2 |
| Composite score | 64.3 | 68.6 |
| Human preference score | 69.0 | 69.3 |
| Instruction following score | 64.3 | 79.7 |
| Knowledge score | 60.9 | 64.6 |
| Long context score | 64.5 | 65.5 |
| Maths score | 48.4 | 56.4 |
| Multimodal score | 65.7 | 65.9 |
| Reasoning score | 67.1 | 70.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $4.50 | – |
| Context window | 1M | 262k |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.6% | 89.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 91.4% | 88.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 72.9% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | 40.6% |
| Terminal-Bench | 69.4% | – |
| SimpleBench | 76.4% | – |
| GDPval | 40.3% | – |
| SciCode | – | 51.5% |
| Remote Labor Index | 1.3% | – |
| WeirdML | 69.9% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 31.5% | – |
| ProofBench | 20.0% | 17.0% |
| GSO-Bench | 18.6% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.0 | 152.1 |
| LMArena Text | 1486 | 1488 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1504 | 1505 |
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1526 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | 1306 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 28.0 | 31.3 |
| IFBench | 70.4% | 75.9% |
| AA-LCR | 76.0% | 78.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.2% | 80.5% |
| AA-Omniscience | 15.3 | 7.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 41.7% | 45.5% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.8% | 88.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.7% | 40.7% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 87.1% | 91.5% |
| AIME (Vals) | – | 96.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.4% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 90.1% | 87.3% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.2% |
| CorpFin | – | 65.1% |
| TaxEval | – | 77.7% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 89.7% |
| AIME 2026 | 91.7% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 86.4% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 23.4% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 43.3% | 55.0% |
| MCP Atlas | 70.3% | 82.2% |
| MultiChallenge | 65.7% | 75.5% |
| PRBench Finance | 39.2% | 52.4% |
| PRBench Legal | 40.6% | 52.3% |
| VISTA | 51.5% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | 59.0% |
| TutorBench | 53.7% | 68.5% |
| MMMU-Pro (official) | 81.0% | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.1% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 74.2% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold) | 77.4% | – |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 75.0% | – |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.0% | – |
| BFCL Overall | 72.5% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Gemini 3 Pro vs Muse Spark: questions
- Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Muse Spark?
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Muse Spark for coding?
- Muse Spark scores higher in coding (66 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Muse Spark for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark scores higher in agentic tasks (66 vs 62 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Gemini 3 Pro accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.