BenchLeader

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5 Pro

Verdict
  • GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT-5 Pro are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.8).
  • GLM 5.3 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, long context, reasoning.
  • GPT-5 Pro is stronger in knowledge, multimodal.
  • GLM 5.3 Flash is 347× cheaper ($0.119 vs $41.25 per 1M blended).
MetricGLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5 Pro
BenchLeader Index61.160.8
Agents & tools score52.1
Coding score64.3
Composite score61.7
Human preference score67.6
Knowledge score67.768.0
Long context score66.6
Multimodal score65.567.4
Reasoning score67.557.6
Blended price $/M$0.119$41.25
Output speed90 tok/s
Time to first answer24.9 s
Context window1M400k
Humanity's Last Exam31.6%
SimpleBench61.6%
SciCode46.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index151.4150.3
LMArena Text1474
LMArena Hard Prompts1496
LMArena Coding1534
LMArena WebDev1605
LMArena Vision1296
LMArena Agent2
LiveBench71.6%
LiveBench Reasoning77.6%
LiveBench Coding79.0%
LiveBench Agentic Coding56.8%
LiveBench Mathematics81.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis76.4%
LiveBench Language77.3%
AA Intelligence Index41.9
AA-LCR80.0%
AA-Omniscience7.5
GPQA Diamond (AA)91.2%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)39.9%
SciCode (AA)51.6%
PRBench Finance51.1%
PRBench Legal49.9%
VISTA52.4%
MultiNRC65.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark76.8%
ARC-AGI-170.2%
ARC-AGI-218.3%

Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-5 Pro: questions

Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than GPT-5 Pro?
GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT-5 Pro are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.8). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GLM 5.3 Flash is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT-5 Pro?
GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper: $0.119 against $41.25 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 400k tokens.