GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2.6
GLM 5.3 Flash 
Kimi K2.6 Verdict
- GLM 5.3 Flash and Kimi K2.6 are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.7).
- GLM 5.3 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Kimi K2.6 is stronger in composite, long context, instruction following, maths.
- GLM 5.3 Flash is 14× cheaper ($0.119 vs $1.71 per 1M blended).
- GLM 5.3 Flash streams 2.0× faster (90 vs 44 tokens per second).
| Metric | GLM 5.3 Flash | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.1 | 60.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 52.1 | 45.1 |
| Coding score | 64.3 | 60.4 |
| Composite score | 61.7 | 68.6 |
| Human preference score | 67.6 | 60.8 |
| Knowledge score | 67.7 | 58.6 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 67.1 |
| Multimodal score | 65.5 | 63.7 |
| Reasoning score | 67.5 | 66.0 |
| Instruction following score | – | 73.7 |
| Maths score | – | 53.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.119 | $1.71 |
| Output speed | 90 tok/s | 44 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 24.9 s | 103.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 262k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.8% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 25.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 96.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 34.9% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | – | 4.6% |
| SciCode | 46.1% | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | – | 55.9% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 18.9% |
| ProofBench | – | 16.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.4 | 151.0 |
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1461 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1496 | 1485 |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1514 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1605 | 1509 |
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | 1281 |
| LMArena Agent | 2 | – |
| LiveBench | 71.6% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 77.6% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 79.0% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 56.8% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 81.2% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 76.4% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 77.3% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.9 | 31.3 |
| IFBench | – | 76.0% |
| AA-LCR | 80.0% | 81.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 79.4% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.5 | 5.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.2% | 91.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.9% | 37.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | 51.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 86.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 87.6% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.7% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 74.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 53.6% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 76.2% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 89.1% |
| Vals Index | – | 43.5 |
| HiL-Bench | – | 18.7% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1202 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K2.6: questions
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Kimi K2.6?
- GLM 5.3 Flash and Kimi K2.6 are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.7). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GLM 5.3 Flash is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Kimi K2.6 for coding?
- GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher in coding (64 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Kimi K2.6 for agentic tasks?
- GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (52 vs 45 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6?
- GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper: $0.119 against $1.71 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GLM 5.3 Flash or Kimi K2.6?
- GLM 5.3 Flash streams faster: 90 against 44 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GLM 5.3 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.