GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mimo v2 Pro
GLM 5.3 Flash 
Mimo v2 Pro Verdict
- GLM 5.3 Flash and Mimo v2 Pro are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.6).
- GLM 5.3 Flash is stronger in coding, human preference, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- Mimo v2 Pro is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following.
- GLM 5.3 Flash is 25× cheaper ($0.119 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | GLM 5.3 Flash | Mimo v2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.1 | 60.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 52.1 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 64.3 | 54.7 |
| Composite score | 61.7 | 65.2 |
| Human preference score | 67.6 | 64.5 |
| Knowledge score | 67.7 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 66.6 | 60.5 |
| Multimodal score | 65.5 | – |
| Reasoning score | 67.5 | 65.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 67.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.119 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 90 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 24.9 s | – |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 46.1% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.4 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1448 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1496 | 1476 |
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1605 | 1433 |
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 2 | – |
| LiveBench | 71.6% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 77.6% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 79.0% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 56.8% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 81.2% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 76.4% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 77.3% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.9 | 28.6 |
| IFBench | – | 68.8% |
| AA-LCR | 80.0% | 68.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.5 | 4.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 40.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.2% | 87.0% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.9% | 30.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mimo v2 Pro: questions
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Mimo v2 Pro?
- GLM 5.3 Flash and Mimo v2 Pro are level on quality (61.1 vs 60.6). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GLM 5.3 Flash is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Mimo v2 Pro for coding?
- GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher in coding (64 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Mimo v2 Pro for agentic tasks?
- Mimo v2 Pro scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 52 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Mimo v2 Pro?
- GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper: $0.119 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Mimo v2 Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.