GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
GPT-5.5 
MiMo-V2.5-Pro Verdict
- GPT-5.5 leads on quality: 66.7 vs 59.1.
- GPT-5.5 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is stronger in coding, instruction following, maths.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 17× cheaper ($0.653 vs $11.25 per 1M blended).
- GPT-5.5 streams 2.3× faster (85 vs 36 tokens per second).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 66.7 | 59.1 |
| Agents & tools score | 68.5 | 51.2 |
| Coding score | 57.2 | 58.4 |
| Composite score | 77.8 | 62.4 |
| Human preference score | 67.9 | 61.7 |
| Instruction following score | 73.6 | 77.0 |
| Knowledge score | 73.9 | 57.6 |
| Long context score | 68.8 | 66.4 |
| Multimodal score | 64.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 70.1 | 67.5 |
| Maths score | – | 43.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $11.25 | $0.653 |
| Output speed | 85 tok/s | 36 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 58.6 s | 60.0 s |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1.0M |
| Terminal-Bench | 84.7% | – |
| SimpleBench | 69.0% | – |
| SciCode | – | 50.2% |
| Remote Labor Index | 6.3% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 38.5% | – |
| FrontierCode | 43.0% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 22.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.1 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1477 | 1468 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1498 | 1496 |
| LMArena Coding | 1509 | 1521 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1458 | 1475 |
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 3 | -5.1 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.6 | 26.4 |
| IFBench | 75.8% | 79.9% |
| AA-LCR | 84.3% | 79.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.9% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 20.5 | 3.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 60.6% | 43.2% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.5% | 86.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 45.8% | 35.7% |
| SciCode (AA) | 55.8% | 50.6% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 93.9% | 94.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 81.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 84.6% |
| LegalBench | – | 77.1% |
| CorpFin | – | 61.4% |
| TaxEval | – | 73.8% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 57.3% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 74.0% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 82.6% |
| Vals Index | – | 41.0 |
| HiL-Bench | 39.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1315 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 88.8% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: questions
- Is GPT-5.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
- GPT-5.5 leads on quality: 66.7 vs 59.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-5.5 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GPT-5.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in coding (58 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GPT-5.5 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for agentic tasks?
- GPT-5.5 scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 51 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper: $0.653 against $11.25 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
- GPT-5.5 streams faster: 85 against 36 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GPT-5.5 accepts more context: 1.1M against 1.0M tokens.