Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1
Kimi K2.6 
Muse Spark 1.1 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 60.7.
- Kimi K2.6 is stronger in long context, maths.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Kimi K2.6 is 1.2× cheaper ($1.71 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 4.4× faster (194 vs 44 tokens per second).
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.7 | 65.0 |
| Agents & tools score | 45.1 | 62.7 |
| Coding score | 60.4 | 68.1 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 72.3 |
| Human preference score | 60.8 | 66.3 |
| Instruction following score | 73.7 | 77.8 |
| Knowledge score | 58.6 | 73.2 |
| Long context score | 67.1 | 65.4 |
| Maths score | 53.8 | 52.2 |
| Multimodal score | 63.7 | 65.0 |
| Reasoning score | 66.0 | 69.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.71 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 44 tok/s | 194 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 103.2 s | 2.6 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 57.2% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.1% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 76.7% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | 57.8% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | 4.6% | – |
| SciCode | 53.5% | 58.2% |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 18.9% | 41.9% |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | 39.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.0 | 154.6 |
| LMArena Text | 1461 | 1492 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1511 |
| LMArena Coding | 1514 | 1531 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1541 |
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | 1293 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -2.6 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 34.3 |
| IFBench | 76.0% | – |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | 77.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 5.3 | 28.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 43.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.1% | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 37.5% | 46.2% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.5% | 58.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.9% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.6% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.7% | – |
| CorpFin | 66.7% | – |
| TaxEval | 74.7% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 53.6% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 76.2% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.1% | – |
| Vals Index | 43.5 | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | – | 61.5% |
| MCP Atlas | – | 88.1% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 75.3% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 55.0% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 57.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 65.6% |
| HiL-Bench | 18.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | 1260 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark 1.1: questions
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 60.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in coding (68 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark 1.1 for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in agentic tasks (63 vs 45 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Kimi K2.6 is cheaper: $1.71 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 44 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 262k tokens.