Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Kimi K2.6 
Muse Spark 1.2 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 60.7.
- Kimi K2.6 is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following, long context, multimodal.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- Kimi K2.6 is 1.2× cheaper ($1.71 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.2 streams 4.3× faster (193 vs 44 tokens per second).
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.7 | 62.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 45.1 | – |
| Coding score | 60.4 | 66.5 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 79.3 |
| Human preference score | 60.8 | – |
| Instruction following score | 73.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 58.6 | 77.1 |
| Long context score | 67.1 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 53.8 | 54.3 |
| Multimodal score | 63.7 | – |
| Reasoning score | 66.0 | 70.7 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.71 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | 44 tok/s | 193 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 103.2 s | 23.4 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | – |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 57.2% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.1% | – |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 76.7% | – |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | – |
| SimpleBench | – | 74.5% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | 4.6% | – |
| SciCode | 53.5% | – |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 18.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | 43.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.0 | 155.5 |
| LMArena Text | 1461 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1514 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 39.8 |
| IFBench | 76.0% | – |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 5.3 | 27.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 43.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.1% | 90.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 37.5% | 45.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.5% | 57.4% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.9% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.6% | – |
| IOI | – | 49.5% |
| LegalBench | 84.7% | – |
| CorpFin | 66.7% | – |
| TaxEval | 74.7% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 53.6% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 76.2% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.1% | – |
| Vals Index | 43.5 | – |
| HiL-Bench | 18.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2: questions
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark 1.2?
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 60.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.2 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in coding (67 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark 1.2?
- Kimi K2.6 is cheaper: $1.71 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark 1.2?
- Muse Spark 1.2 streams faster: 193 against 44 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.0M against 262k tokens.