Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3 7
Kimi K2.6 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (60.7 vs 61.3).
- Kimi K2.6 is stronger in composite, human preference, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, instruction following, knowledge, maths, reasoning.
- Kimi K2.6 is 2.2× cheaper ($1.71 vs $3.75 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3 7 (max) streams 3.8× faster (169 vs 44 tokens per second).
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.7 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 45.1 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 60.4 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 60.8 | 57.2 |
| Instruction following score | 73.7 | 77.6 |
| Knowledge score | 58.6 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 67.1 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 53.8 | 57.4 |
| Multimodal score | 63.7 | – |
| Reasoning score | 66.0 | 66.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $1.71 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 44 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 103.2 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.8% | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 57.2% | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 25.6% | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.1% | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | 76.7% | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| OSWorld-Verified 2.0 | 4.6% | – |
| SciCode | 53.5% | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 18.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.0 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1461 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1514 | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1517 |
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | – |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | 76.0% | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 79.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 5.3 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 43.9% | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.1% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 37.5% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.5% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.9% | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.6% | 89.3% |
| IOI | – | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | 84.7% | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | 66.7% | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | 74.7% | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 53.6% | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 76.2% | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.1% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | 43.5 | 44.8 |
| HiL-Bench | 18.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1202 | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Qwen3 7?
- Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (60.7 vs 61.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3 7 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Qwen3 7 scores higher in coding (61 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Kimi K2.6 better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3 7 scores higher in agentic tasks (56 vs 45 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3 7?
- Kimi K2.6 is cheaper: $1.71 against $3.75 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 streams faster: 169 against 44 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Qwen3 7 accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.