Kimi K3 vs Qwen3 7
Kimi K3 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Kimi K3 leads on quality: 66.5 vs 61.3.
- Kimi K3 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in instruction following, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is 1.6× cheaper ($3.75 vs $6.00 per 1M blended).
- Qwen3 7 (max) streams 4.5× faster (169 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | Kimi K3 | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 66.5 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.4 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 65.0 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 74.2 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 71.2 | 57.2 |
| Knowledge score | 68.2 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 71.1 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 78.1 | 57.4 |
| Multimodal score | 65.0 | – |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.6 |
| Reasoning score | – | 66.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $6.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 38 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 56.3 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | 58.7% | 48.8% |
| APEX-Agents | 39.3% | – |
| FrontierCode | 44.2% | – |
| ProofBench | 87.0% | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 157.6 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1517 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | 79.2% | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 90.7% | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 81.5% | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 62.2% | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 84.4% | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 78.7% | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | 85.5% | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 43.8 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 88.7% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 19.7 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.5% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 46.9% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 59.5% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| IOI | – | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | 71.6% | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | 75.7% | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 80.9% | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 93.4% | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 92.9% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | 57.8 | 44.8 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1339 | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen3 7?
- Kimi K3 leads on quality: 66.5 vs 61.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Kimi K3 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Kimi K3 scores higher in coding (65 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Kimi K3 scores higher in agentic tasks (67 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 is cheaper: $3.75 against $6.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Kimi K3 or Qwen3 7?
- Qwen3 7 streams faster: 169 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Kimi K3 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.