Mimo v2 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2
Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 60.6.
- Mimo v2 Pro is stronger in agents & tools, human preference, instruction following.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning, maths.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is 1.5× cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Mimo v2 Pro | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.6 | 62.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.4 | – |
| Coding score | 54.7 | 66.5 |
| Composite score | 65.2 | 79.3 |
| Human preference score | 64.5 | – |
| Instruction following score | 67.5 | – |
| Knowledge score | 66.3 | 77.1 |
| Long context score | 60.5 | 66.0 |
| Reasoning score | 65.2 | 70.7 |
| Maths score | – | 54.3 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | – | 193 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 23.4 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| SimpleBench | – | 74.5% |
| ProofBench | – | 43.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 155.5 |
| LMArena Text | 1448 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1476 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 28.6 | 39.8 |
| IFBench | 68.8% | – |
| AA-LCR | 68.3% | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 4.6 | 27.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 40.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 87.0% | 90.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 30.4% | 45.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 57.4% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.0% | – |
| IOI | – | 49.5% |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Mimo v2 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.2: questions
- Is Mimo v2 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2?
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 60.6. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.2 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Mimo v2 Pro better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in coding (67 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Mimo v2 Pro or Muse Spark 1.2?
- Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 1.0M tokens of context.