Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Muse Spark 1.1 
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 58.7.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is stronger in agents & tools.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 5.2× cheaper ($0.387 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 2.5× faster (194 vs 78 tokens per second).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.0 | 58.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 62.7 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 68.1 | 51.7 |
| Composite score | 72.3 | 53.1 |
| Human preference score | 66.3 | 63.6 |
| Instruction following score | 77.8 | 76.1 |
| Knowledge score | 73.2 | 49.5 |
| Long context score | 65.4 | 65.2 |
| Maths score | 52.2 | 50.1 |
| Multimodal score | 65.0 | 61.6 |
| Reasoning score | 69.2 | 63.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $2.00 | $0.387 |
| Output speed | 194 tok/s | 78 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 2.6 s | 42.7 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 262k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 85.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 29.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 88.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | – |
| SciCode | 58.2% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 41.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 39.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.6 | 147.0 |
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1441 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1463 |
| LMArena Coding | 1531 | 1491 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | 1399 |
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | 1265 |
| LMArena Agent | -2.6 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.3 | 19.1 |
| IFBench | – | 78.8% |
| AA-LCR | 77.7% | 77.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 77.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 28.1 | -30.8 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 40.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 89.8% | 89.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 46.2% | 29.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | 58.8% | 44.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.6% |
| AIME 2026 | – | 94.2% |
| HMMT February 2026 | – | 87.9% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 61.5% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 88.1% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.3% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 55.0% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 57.0% | – |
| MultiNRC | 65.6% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: questions
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 58.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in coding (68 vs 52 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 63 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper: $0.387 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 78 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 262k tokens.