Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 7
Muse Spark 1.1 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 61.3.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in long context, maths.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is 1.9× cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.75 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.0 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 62.7 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 68.1 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 72.3 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 66.3 | 57.2 |
| Instruction following score | 77.8 | 77.6 |
| Knowledge score | 73.2 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 65.4 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 52.2 | 57.4 |
| Multimodal score | 65.0 | – |
| Reasoning score | 69.2 | 66.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $2.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 194 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 2.6 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | 58.2% | 48.8% |
| APEX-Agents | 41.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 39.0% | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.6 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1531 | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | 1517 |
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | – |
| LMArena Agent | -2.6 | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.3 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 77.7% | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 28.1 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 89.8% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 46.2% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 58.8% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| IOI | – | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 61.5% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 88.1% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.3% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 55.0% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 57.0% | – |
| MultiNRC | 65.6% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 61.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in coding (68 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in agentic tasks (63 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.75 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 169 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.