Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Muse Spark 1.1 
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 59.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in coding, long context.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 8.7× cheaper ($0.230 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams 3.6× faster (194 vs 54 tokens per second).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.0 | 59.1 |
| Agents & tools score | 62.7 | 49.4 |
| Coding score | 68.1 | 70.8 |
| Composite score | 72.3 | 67.3 |
| Human preference score | 66.3 | – |
| Instruction following score | 77.8 | – |
| Knowledge score | 73.2 | 59.5 |
| Long context score | 65.4 | 66.4 |
| Maths score | 52.2 | – |
| Multimodal score | 65.0 | 64.3 |
| Reasoning score | 69.2 | – |
| Blended price $/M | $2.00 | $0.230 |
| Output speed | 194 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 2.6 s | 39.9 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 256k |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | – |
| SciCode | 58.2% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 41.9% | – |
| ProofBench | 39.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.6 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1492 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1531 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | 1631 |
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | – |
| LMArena Agent | -2.6 | 0.8 |
| LiveBench | – | 76.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 87.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.5% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 74.6% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.3 | 39.9 |
| AA-LCR | 77.7% | 79.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 79.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 28.1 | -9.7 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 89.8% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 46.2% | 38.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | 58.8% | 50.6% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 61.5% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 88.1% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.3% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 55.0% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 57.0% | – |
| MultiNRC | 65.6% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: questions
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Muse Spark 1.1 leads on quality: 65.0 vs 59.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.1 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for coding?
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores higher in coding (71 vs 68 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in agentic tasks (63 vs 49 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is cheaper: $0.230 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Muse Spark 1.1 streams faster: 194 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.0M against 256k tokens.