Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 7
Muse Spark 1.2 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 61.3.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is stronger in coding, composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in maths, agents & tools, human preference, instruction following.
- Muse Spark 1.2 is 1.9× cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.75 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.7 | 61.3 |
| Coding score | 66.5 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 79.3 | 56.4 |
| Knowledge score | 77.1 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 66.0 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 54.3 | 57.4 |
| Reasoning score | 70.7 | 66.8 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 56.0 |
| Human preference score | – | 57.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 77.6 |
| Blended price $/M | $2.00 | $3.75 |
| Output speed | 193 tok/s | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 23.4 s | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | 70.4% |
| SciCode | – | 48.8% |
| ProofBench | 43.0% | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.5 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | – | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1517 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 39.8 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 79.0% | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.2 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.4% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 45.5% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 57.4% | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| IOI | 49.5% | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.2 leads on quality: 62.7 vs 61.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.2 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in coding (67 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.75 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark 1.2 streams faster: 193 against 169 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.