BenchLeader

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3 8

Verdict
  • Qwen3 8 (max) leads on quality: 63.9 vs 62.6.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, maths, reasoning.
  • Qwen3 8 (max) is stronger in coding, agents & tools, human preference, multimodal.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is 1.3× cheaper ($2.00 vs $2.67 per 1M blended).
  • Muse Spark 1.2 streams 5.6× faster (219 vs 39 tokens per second).
MetricMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3 8 (max)
BenchLeader Index62.663.9
Coding score66.571.7
Composite score79.170.8
Knowledge score76.962.3
Long context score66.065.7
Maths score54.3
Reasoning score70.267.7
Agents & tools score56.1
Human preference score67.9
Multimodal score67.2
Blended price $/M$2.00$2.67
Output speed219 tok/s39 tok/s
Time to first answer23.7 s53.2 s
Context window1.0M1M
SimpleBench74.5%
ProofBench43.0%
Epoch Capabilities Index155.5156.6
LMArena Text1480
LMArena Hard Prompts1502
LMArena Coding1520
LMArena WebDev1685
LMArena Vision1313
LMArena Agent3.9
LiveBench78.5%
LiveBench Reasoning88.2%
LiveBench Coding72.9%
LiveBench Agentic Coding64.7%
LiveBench Mathematics91.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis78.4%
LiveBench Language79.7%
AA Intelligence Index39.840.3
AA-LCR79.0%78.3%
MMMU-Pro82.3%
AA-Omniscience27.23.4
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.4%92.7%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)45.5%43.0%
SciCode (AA)57.4%53.2%
LiveCodeBench87.8%
MMLU-Pro88.6%
IOI49.5%73.0%
LegalBench83.6%
CorpFin65.8%
TaxEval75.5%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)67.4%
SWE-bench (Vals)85.6%
GPQA Diamond (Vals)93.7%
Vals Index51.8

Data as of 2026-09-09. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.