Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Muse Spark 
Qwen3.5 397B A17B Verdict
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.7.
- Muse Spark is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B is stronger in agents & tools.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 58.7 |
| Agents & tools score | 66.4 | 69.4 |
| Coding score | 66.2 | 51.7 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 53.1 |
| Human preference score | 69.3 | 63.6 |
| Instruction following score | 79.7 | 76.1 |
| Knowledge score | 64.6 | 49.5 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 65.2 |
| Maths score | 56.4 | 50.1 |
| Multimodal score | 65.9 | 61.6 |
| Reasoning score | 70.2 | 63.0 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $0.387 |
| Output speed | – | 78 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 42.7 s |
| Context window | 262k | 262k |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 85.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 29.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 88.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | – |
| SciCode | 51.5% | – |
| ProofBench | 17.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.1 | 147.0 |
| LMArena Text | 1488 | 1441 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1505 | 1463 |
| LMArena Coding | 1526 | 1491 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1399 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | 1265 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 19.1 |
| IFBench | 75.9% | 78.8% |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 77.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | 77.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.2 | -30.8 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 45.5% | 40.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 88.4% | 89.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.7% | 29.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 44.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 91.5% | 95.6% |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.9% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.2% | – |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 77.7% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.7% | – |
| AIME 2026 | – | 94.2% |
| HMMT February 2026 | – | 87.9% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.0% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 82.2% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.5% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 52.4% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.3% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | – |
| TutorBench | 68.5% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: questions
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.7. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?
- Muse Spark scores higher in coding (66 vs 52 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher in agentic tasks (69 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Both accept 262k tokens of context.