Muse Spark vs Qwen3 7
Muse Spark 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.3.
- Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in long context, maths.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 61.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 66.4 | 56.0 |
| Coding score | 66.2 | 61.4 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 56.4 |
| Human preference score | 69.3 | 57.2 |
| Instruction following score | 79.7 | 77.6 |
| Knowledge score | 64.6 | 63.6 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 66.0 |
| Maths score | 56.4 | 57.4 |
| Multimodal score | 65.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 70.2 | 66.8 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $3.75 |
| Output speed | – | 169 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 16.5 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | – |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | 51.5% | 48.8% |
| ProofBench | 17.0% | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.1 | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1488 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1505 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1526 | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1517 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | – |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 29.9 |
| IFBench | 75.9% | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 79.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.2 | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 45.5% | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 88.4% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.7% | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 91.5% | 94.7% |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.9% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | 89.3% |
| IOI | – | 46.8% |
| LegalBench | 84.2% | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | 77.7% | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.4% | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.7% | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.0% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 82.2% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.5% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 52.4% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.3% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | – |
| TutorBench | 68.5% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 7?
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 61.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Muse Spark scores higher in coding (66 vs 61 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3 7 for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark scores higher in agentic tasks (66 vs 56 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Qwen3 7 accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.