Muse Spark vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Muse Spark 
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next Verdict
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 59.1.
- Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is stronger in coding, long context.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 59.1 |
| Agents & tools score | 66.4 | 49.4 |
| Coding score | 66.2 | 70.8 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 67.3 |
| Human preference score | 69.3 | – |
| Instruction following score | 79.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 64.6 | 59.5 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 66.4 |
| Maths score | 56.4 | – |
| Multimodal score | 65.9 | 64.3 |
| Reasoning score | 70.2 | – |
| Blended price $/M | – | $0.230 |
| Output speed | – | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 39.9 s |
| Context window | 262k | 256k |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | – |
| SciCode | 51.5% | – |
| ProofBench | 17.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.1 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1488 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1505 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1526 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1631 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | – |
| LMArena Agent | – | 0.8 |
| LiveBench | – | 76.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 87.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 72.5% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 74.6% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 39.9 |
| IFBench | 75.9% | – |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 79.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | 79.8% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.2 | -9.7 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 45.5% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 88.4% | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.7% | 38.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 50.6% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 91.5% | – |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.9% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.2% | – |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 77.7% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.4% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.7% | – |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.0% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 82.2% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.5% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 52.4% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.3% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | – |
| TutorBench | 68.5% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next: questions
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 59.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for coding?
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores higher in coding (71 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark scores higher in agentic tasks (66 vs 49 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark accepts more context: 262k against 256k tokens.