Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3 6
Grok 4.5 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- Grok 4.5 and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.5 vs 63.3).
- Grok 4.5 is stronger in coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, long context, instruction following, maths.
- They cost about the same ($2.96 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.5 | 63.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 58.6 | 72.0 |
| Coding score | 59.8 | 58.2 |
| Composite score | 66.2 | 64.9 |
| Human preference score | 67.2 | 65.9 |
| Knowledge score | 76.2 | 64.0 |
| Long context score | 66.2 | 66.9 |
| Multimodal score | 64.9 | – |
| Reasoning score | 69.2 | 63.2 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.2 |
| Maths score | – | 64.2 |
| Blended price $/M | $3.00 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 52 tok/s | 59 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 13.6 s | 38.5 s |
| Context window | 500k | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | – | 87.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | – | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 52.0% |
| SimpleBench | 70.0% | 63.0% |
| WeirdML | 46.4% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 34.2% | – |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.9 | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1471 | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1495 | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | 1523 | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1556 | 1479 |
| LMArena Vision | 1291 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 3.9 | – |
| LiveBench | 75.8% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.2% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 68.6% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 56.5% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 90.8% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 73.0% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 82.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 39.1 | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | 79.3% | 80.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.4% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 25.3 | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 93.1% | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.7% | 30.8% |
| SciCode (AA) | 55.0% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 72.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 83.5% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen3 6?
- Grok 4.5 and Qwen3 6 (max) are level on quality (63.5 vs 63.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Grok 4.5 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen3 6 for coding?
- Grok 4.5 scores higher in coding (60 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Grok 4.5 better than Qwen3 6 for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3 6 scores higher in agentic tasks (72 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 is cheaper: $2.96 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Grok 4.5 or Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 streams faster: 59 against 52 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Grok 4.5 accepts more context: 500k against 246k tokens.