BenchLeader

Grok 4.5

Reasoning effort

Grok 4.5 is a SpaceXAI proprietary reasoning model, released 8 Jul 2026. Its best configuration (high reasoning effort) ranks #134 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 59.3 ±4.6, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 233 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in composite (73) and lowest in agents & tools (50). At $3.00 per million tokens blended it is pricier than most ranked models. Output speed of 72 tokens per second puts it slower than most, with a first answer in 9.2 s. It has been measured at 4 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 20 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$3.00/M
$2.00 in · $6.00 out
Output speed
72 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
9.17 s
first token 1.66 s
Context
500k
Full answer
16 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
$0.881
one full Intelligence Index run
Released
8 Jul 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index59
  2. Reasoning60
  3. Coding57
  4. Agents & tools50
  5. Maths53
  6. Knowledge63
  7. Multimodal64
  8. Long context65
  9. Composite73

Versions

SpaceXAI has shipped 11 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Grok 4.7high21 Sept 202663.9#59
Grok 4.6medium11 Aug 202664.2#56
Grok 4.5highthis page8 Jul 202659.3#134
Grok 4.3medium17 Apr 202658.7#147
Grok 4.2high10 Mar 2026––
Grok 4.20thinking17 Feb 202658.6#148
Grok 4.117 Nov 202557.2#184
Grok 49 Jul 202558.0#161
Grok 317 Feb 202551.5#340
Grok 212 Dec 202441.9#612
Grok 4.20 1–––

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
low––55 tok/s1.66 s$0.0026Reasoning 48
medium––55 tok/s1.66 s$0.0026Reasoning 54
highbest59.3#13472 tok/s9.17 s$0.0026Agents & tools 50 · Coding 57 · Composite 73 · Knowledge 63 · Long context 65 · Maths 53 · Multimodal 64 · Reasoning 60
not stated59.0#14055 tok/s1.66 s$0.0026Agents & tools 57 · Coding 57 · Composite 53 · Human preference 65 · Maths 65 · Multimodal 63 · Reasoning 69

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 23 Oct 2026
495868
  • high
  • not stated

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarklowmediumhighnot statedSourceTrend
GPQA Diamond––93.4%#17–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
SimpleBencheffort not stated–––70.0%#14SimpleBench
Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated–––1488#52Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench 2.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–––87.2%#26LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–––87.2%#29LiveBench
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in index––93.1%#24–Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index––42.7%#65–Artificial Analysis
GPQA Diamond (Vals)not in index––92.9%#12–Vals AI
Kagi LLM Benchmarkeffort not stated–––83.5%#6Kagi LLM Benchmark
ARC-AGI-179.2%#12287.2%#9785.7%#110–ARC Prize
ARC-AGI-233.1%#12652.6%#10652.6%#106–ARC Prize
ARC-AGI-30.3%#530.3%#530.3%#53–ARC Prize
CritPt––15.4%#89–Artificial Analysis
Chess Puzzlesnot in index––35.0%#57–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LMCAnot in index––45.2%#89–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DTBenchnot in index––96.5%#22–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
ForecastBenchnot in index––66.1%#6–ForecastBench

Coding

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
SciCode55.0%#52–SciCode
WeirdMLeffort not stated–46.4%#79WeirdML
FrontierCodeeffort not stated–42.4%#21Cognition
Arena Codingeffort not stated–1514#48Arena (LMArena)
Arena WebDeveffort not stated–1553#41Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench 2.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–94.3%#7LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–68.6%#63LiveBench
SciCode (AA)not in index55.0%#56–Artificial Analysis
LiveCodeBench87.3%#14–Vals AI
IOI40.6%#33–Vals AI
SWE-bench (Vals)not in index86.6%#13–Vals AI
Code Migrationnot in index36.6%#34–Vals AI
ProgramBenchnot in index0.0%#32–Vals AI
Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in index69.0%#44–Vals AI
Surface Evolver Benchnot in index74.4%#10–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DeepSWE v1.1not in index53.8%#42–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
ALE-Benchnot in index1309.3#32–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index10.6%#88–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA)not in index81.7%#40–Artificial Analysis
Startrise Frontendnot in indexeffort not stated–68.0%#21Startrise

Agents & tools

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
Terminal-Bench12.4%#79–Terminal-Bench
APEX-Agentseffort not stated–56.2%#17Mercor
LiveBench Long Agenticnot in indexeffort not stated–27.9%#36LiveBench
LiveBench Browsernot in indexeffort not stated–44.0%#33LiveBench
LiveBench Agentic Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–56.5%#27LiveBench
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)67.8%#32–Vals AI
τ³-bench Bankingnot in index47.9%#3–τ²-bench
τ³-Banking (AA)42.1%#23–Artificial Analysis
Analyst Agent (AA)not in index35.0%#28–Artificial Analysis
CyberBenchnot in index71.0%#20–Vals AI
Finance Agent v2not in index48.4%#50–Vals AI
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1not in index12.9%#12–Vals AI
Legal Research Benchnot in index38.0%#38–Vals AI
SkillsBenchnot in index66.0%#2–Vals AI
SREBenchnot in index0.8%#26–Vals AI
Tax Agent Benchnot in index24.9%#38–Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)not in index8.6%#40–Vals AI
Time Horizon Index: KSPnot in index6.3%#11–Vals AI
Web Search Indexnot in index35.5%#9–Vals AI
Arena Searchnot in indexeffort not stated–1206#16Arena (LMArena)
PostTrainBenchnot in index23.4%#10–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
GBAEvalnot in indexeffort not stated–65.4%#4Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Vending-Bench 2not in indexeffort not stated–3887.4#42Andon Labs
AutomationBenchnot in index57.9%#46–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index18.8%#70–Artificial Analysis
EnterpriseOps-Gymnot in index40.8%#25–Artificial Analysis
FACTS Searchnot in indexeffort not stated–79.4%#14Google

Maths

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
FrontierMath Tiers 1–357.2%#45–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%#50–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%#31–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
ProofBench31.0%#42–Vals AI
LiveBench Mathematicsnot in indexeffort not stated–90.8%#34LiveBench
Arena Mathseffort not stated–1473#47Arena (LMArena)

Knowledge

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
SimpleQA Verified48.3%#32–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LiveBench 2.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–73.0%#32LiveBench
LiveBench Researchnot in indexeffort not stated–85.9%#6LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–73.0%#43LiveBench
AA-Omniscience25.3#52–Artificial Analysis
MMLU-Pro89.2%#14–Vals AI
LegalBench86.0%#19–Vals AI
CorpFin67.4%#12–Vals AI
TaxEval71.7%#72–Vals AI
Excel Modeling Benchmarknot in index52.9%#51–Vals AI
MedCodenot in index43.3%#46–Vals AI
MedScribenot in index86.9%#19–Vals AI
GDP.pdfnot in index14.0%#42–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index51.5%#55–Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index45.9%#141–Artificial Analysis

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Languagenot in index82.8%#23LiveBench
LiveBench Instruction Followingnot in index71.5%#23LiveBench
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1461#50Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1466#52Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1452#36Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1473#55Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1480#49Arena (LMArena)

Multimodal

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
Arena Visioneffort not stated–1287#31Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench Designnot in indexeffort not stated–78.1%#19LiveBench
MMMU-Pro80.4%#49–Artificial Analysis
MMMU-Pro (Vals)not in index61.8%#80–Vals AI
MortgageTaxnot in index61.8%#57–Vals AI
SAGEnot in index35.0%#69–Vals AI
Blueprint-Bench 2not in indexeffort not stated–27.3%#20Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub

Long context

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
AA-LCR79.3%#98–Artificial Analysis
Arena Documentnot in indexeffort not stated–1464#22Arena (LMArena)
MLCRnot in index16.1%#69–Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkhighnot statedSourceTrend
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in indexeffort not stated–154.1#42Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LiveBench 2.0effort not stated–70.1%#25LiveBench
LiveBench 1.0not in indexeffort not stated–75.8%#35LiveBench
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.238.8#75–Artificial Analysis
Vals Multimodal Indexnot in index63.4%#15–Vals AI

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
SpaceXAI54 tok/s1.74 s$2.00$6.00500k–
SpaceXAI51 tok/s1.55 s$2.00$6.00500k–

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.300 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0026$0.002113.3 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.028$0.01217.5 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.021$0.01330.1 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.144$0.0681.1 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0052$0.002712.0 s

More from SpaceXAI

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Grok 4.5's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Grok 4.5 (high effort) scores 59.3 ±4.6 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in composite (73) and weakest in agents & tools (50). That rests on 24 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Grok 4.5 rank?
Grok 4.5 (high effort) is #134 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 233 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Grok 4.5 cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $6.00 per 1M output tokens, $3.00 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was Grok 4.5 released?
SpaceXAI released Grok 4.5 on 8 Jul 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 4 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Grok 4.5: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/grok-4-5.