Muse Spark vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Muse Spark 
Qwen3.6 Plus Verdict
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 59.2.
- Muse Spark is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, instruction following, knowledge, multimodal, reasoning.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is stronger in long context, maths.
| Metric | Muse Spark | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 59.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 66.4 | 57.0 |
| Coding score | 66.2 | 52.8 |
| Composite score | 68.6 | 48.3 |
| Human preference score | 69.3 | 63.9 |
| Instruction following score | 79.7 | 73.0 |
| Knowledge score | 64.6 | 59.0 |
| Long context score | 65.5 | 65.7 |
| Maths score | 56.4 | 56.7 |
| Multimodal score | 65.9 | 62.4 |
| Reasoning score | 70.2 | 64.3 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $1.13 |
| Output speed | – | 56 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 101.1 s |
| Context window | 262k | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 88.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 38.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 93.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 57.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 44.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | – |
| SciCode | 51.5% | 40.7% |
| ProofBench | 17.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.1 | 147.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1488 | 1444 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1505 | 1468 |
| LMArena Coding | 1526 | 1495 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1460 |
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | – |
| LiveBench | – | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 75.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 78.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 41.4% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 83.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 69.9% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 75.0% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 31.3 | 27.0 |
| IFBench | 75.9% | 75.2% |
| AA-LCR | 78.0% | 78.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.5% | 78.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.2 | 0.9 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 45.5% | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 88.4% | 88.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 40.7% | 27.9% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 91.5% | 97.7% |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.9% | 94.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 86.0% |
| MMLU-Pro | 87.3% | 87.7% |
| LegalBench | 84.2% | 84.2% |
| CorpFin | 65.1% | 61.9% |
| TaxEval | 77.7% | 74.7% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 53.2% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.4% | 73.4% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 89.7% | 87.4% |
| Vals Index | – | 32.0 |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 55.0% | – |
| MCP Atlas | 82.2% | – |
| MultiChallenge | 75.5% | – |
| PRBench Finance | 52.4% | – |
| PRBench Legal | 52.3% | – |
| MultiNRC | 59.0% | – |
| TutorBench | 68.5% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-10. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Muse Spark vs Qwen3.6 Plus: questions
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
- Muse Spark leads on quality: 65.6 vs 59.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark is ahead overall as of 2026-09-10, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.6 Plus for coding?
- Muse Spark scores higher in coding (66 vs 53 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.6 Plus for agentic tasks?
- Muse Spark scores higher in agentic tasks (66 vs 57 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which has the larger context window?
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M against 262k tokens.