BenchLeader

Qwen3.6 Plus

Reasoning effort

Qwen3.6 Plus is an Alibaba proprietary reasoning model, released 31 Mar 2026. Its best configuration ranks #144 of 785 on the BenchLeader Index at 58.8 ±3.8, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 231 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in instruction following (73) and lowest in coding (51). At $1.13 per million tokens blended it is pricier than most ranked models. Output speed of 56 tokens per second puts it slower than most, with a first answer in 101.6 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 22 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$1.13/M
$0.500 in · $3.00 out
Output speed
56 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
102 s
first token 0.98 s
Context
1M
Full answer
111 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
–
Released
31 Mar 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index59
  2. Reasoning56
  3. Coding51
  4. Agents & tools53
  5. Maths58
  6. Knowledge58
  7. Instruction following73
  8. Human preference63
  9. Multimodal61
  10. Long context64
  11. Composite60

Versions

Alibaba has shipped 3 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
Qwen3.7 Plus2 Jun 202658.5#150
Qwen3.6 Plusthis page31 Mar 202658.8#144
Qwen3.5 Plusthinking16 Feb 202657.3#182

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
no reasoning––56 tok/s102 s$0.0011Maths 43
not statedbest58.8#14456 tok/s102 s$0.0011Agents & tools 53 · Coding 51 · Composite 60 · Human preference 63 · Instruction following 73 · Knowledge 58 · Long context 64 · Maths 58 · Multimodal 61 · Reasoning 56

How its index has moved

8 Sept 2026 to 19 Oct 2026
485663

The index is recomputed from scratch every day, so a line moves when a new benchmark result lands, when a publisher revises a score, or when the models it is normalised against change. Early movement usually means the score is still settling.

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkno reasoningnot statedSourceTrend
GPQA Diamondeffort not stated–88.4%#60Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Arena Hard Promptseffort not stated–1468#83Arena (LMArena)
LiveBench 1.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–75.8%#60LiveBench
GPQA Diamond (AA)not in indexeffort not stated–88.2%#92Artificial Analysis
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in indexeffort not stated–27.9%#171Artificial Analysis
GPQA Diamond (Vals)not in indexeffort not stated–87.4%#37Vals AI
CritPteffort not stated–2.9%#182Artificial Analysis
Chess Puzzlesnot in indexeffort not stated–14.0%#111Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Mystery Game Puzzlesnot in index12.0%#103–Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
CL-benchnot in indexeffort not stated–20.3%#8Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LMCAnot in indexeffort not stated–33.1%#131Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
DTBenchnot in indexeffort not stated–81.9%#123Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub

Maths

Benchmarkno reasoningnot statedSourceTrend
FrontierMath Tiers 1–332.3%#7238.3%#63Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
OTIS Mock AIMEeffort not stated–93.3%#59Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LiveBench Mathematicsnot in indexeffort not stated–83.7%#58LiveBench
AIME (Vals)effort not stated–94.6%#13Vals AI
Arena Mathseffort not stated–1454#71Arena (LMArena)

Instruction following

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Languagenot in index75.0%#48LiveBench
LiveBench Instruction Followingnot in index58.3%#59LiveBench
IFBench75.2%#34Artificial Analysis
Arena Instruction Followingnot in index1435#86Arena (LMArena)

Human preference

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Arena Text1443#87Arena (LMArena)
Arena Creative Writingnot in index1407#98Arena (LMArena)
Arena Multi-turnnot in index1445#95Arena (LMArena)
Arena Longer Queriesnot in index1454#80Arena (LMArena)

Multimodal

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
MMMU-Pro78.0%#78Artificial Analysis
MMMU-Pro (Vals)not in index84.2%#27Vals AI
MortgageTaxnot in index68.0%#21Vals AI
SAGEnot in index44.9%#43Vals AI

Long context

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
AA-LCR78.3%#112Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarknot statedSourceTrend
Epoch Capabilities Indexnot in index147.3#68Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
LiveBench 1.0not in index68.9%#57LiveBench
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.227.0#146Artificial Analysis
Vals Multimodal Indexnot in index51.5%#24Vals AI

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Alibaba Cloud Int.51 tok/s1.35 s$0.325$1.951M–

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.050 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0011$0.00101.8 min
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0078$0.00381.9 min
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0075$0.00552.1 min
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.042$0.0222.9 min
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0016$0.00091.8 min

More from Alibaba

New this month

See also

Questions people ask

What are Qwen3.6 Plus's benchmark scores?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus scores 58.8 ±3.8 on the BenchLeader Index, strongest in instruction following (73) and weakest in coding (51). That rests on 26 independent benchmark results, and every score on this page links to its publisher.
How does Qwen3.6 Plus rank?
Qwen3.6 Plus is #144 of 785 ranked configurations on 24 Oct 2026. 231 other configurations score within its margin, so the exact position matters less than the band. The leader is Claude Opus 5.5 (max effort) at 72.6.
How much does Qwen3.6 Plus cost per 1M tokens?
As of 24 Oct 2026, Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.500 per 1M input tokens and $3.00 per 1M output tokens, $1.13 blended (three input tokens per output token).
When was Qwen3.6 Plus released?
Alibaba released Qwen3.6 Plus on 31 Mar 2026. BenchLeader has results for it at 2 reasoning-effort settings.

Data as of 24 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “Qwen3.6 Plus: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, data as of 24 Oct 2026, https://www.benchleader.com/models/qwen3-6-plus.