Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2
Agnes 3.0 Flash 
Muse Spark 1.2 Verdict
- Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) leads on quality: 64.1 vs 62.3.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, composite, long context.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) is stronger in knowledge, reasoning, coding, human preference, multimodal.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is 27× cheaper ($0.075 vs $2.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Agnes 3.0 Flash | Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.3 | 64.1 |
| Agents & tools score | 76.8 | 57.5 |
| Composite score | 74.0 | 69.9 |
| Knowledge score | 59.1 | 67.9 |
| Long context score | 67.0 | 65.9 |
| Reasoning score | 71.1 | 73.8 |
| Coding score | – | 57.2 |
| Human preference score | – | 70.6 |
| Multimodal score | – | 66.0 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.075 | $2.00 |
| Output speed | – | 207 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 22.3 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 60.3% |
| SciCode | – | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | – | 60.3% |
| LMArena Text | – | 1500 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1513 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1536 |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1534 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1304 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -1.8 |
| LiveBench | – | 78.0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 90.0% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 77.5% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 57.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 91.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 76.5% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 78.6% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 74.3% |
| AA Intelligence Index | 35.5 | 39.8 |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | -10.6 | 27.2 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.4% | 90.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | 45.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | 57.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 88.3% |
| IOI | – | 21.8% |
| LegalBench | – | 85.3% |
| CorpFin | – | 70.9% |
| TaxEval | – | 80.4% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 69.7% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 86.6% |
| Vals Index | – | 57.0 |
| CritPt | 15.1% | 17.7% |
| GDPval (AA) | 53.7% | 51.2% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 47.6% | 34.9% |
| BioMysteryBench | – | 64.8% |
| Code Migration | – | 29.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 57.0% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 60.6% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 25.4% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 43.8% |
| MedCode | – | 49.4% |
| MedScribe | – | 90.1% |
| MMMU-Pro (Vals) | – | 86.1% |
| MortgageTax | – | 65.4% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 68.5% |
| SAGE | – | 47.7% |
| SkillsBench | – | 53.0% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 5.6% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 79.1% |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1452 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1480 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1520 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | – | 54.9% |
| LMCA | – | 48.4% |
| DTBench | – | 94.7% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 16.0% |
| FrontierSWE | – | 12.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2: questions
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2?
- Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) leads on quality: 64.1 vs 62.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.2 for agentic tasks?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (77 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper: $0.075 against $2.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.