Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Agnes 3.0 Flash 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 62.3.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is stronger in long context.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is 40× cheaper ($0.075 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
| Metric | Agnes 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 62.3 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 76.8 | 78.3 |
| Composite score | 74.0 | 79.8 |
| Knowledge score | 59.1 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 67.0 | 66.6 |
| Reasoning score | 71.1 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.075 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | – | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 984k |
| AA Intelligence Index | 35.5 | 40.0 |
| AA-LCR | 81.0% | 80.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | -10.6 | 4.3 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.4% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | 54.0% |
| CritPt | 15.1% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 53.7% | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 47.6% | 49.1% |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 62.3. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Agnes 3.0 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 77 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash is cheaper: $0.075 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Agnes 3.0 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.