BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Step 5 Preview

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 65.0.
  • Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, knowledge.
  • Step 5 Preview is stronger in long context, reasoning, multimodal.
  • Step 5 Preview is 14× cheaper ($1.43 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (high)Step 5 Preview
BenchLeader Index72.065.0
Agents & tools score66.6
Coding score74.1
Composite score94.084.4
Knowledge score83.772.0
Long context score68.470.8
Reasoning score81.082.1
Multimodal score60.8
Blended price $/M$20.00$1.43
Output speed55 tok/s
Time to first answer14.7 s
Context window1M1M
Terminal-Bench54.5%
SciCode57.6%
WeirdML92.3%
APEX-Agents44.4%
AA Intelligence Index51.243.6
AA-LCR83.7%88.3%
MMMU-Pro76.4%
AA-Omniscience40.816.4
GPQA Diamond (AA)90.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.9%46.5%
SciCode (AA)58.7%58.9%
ARC-AGI-196.0%
ARC-AGI-288.8%
CritPt30.3%20.9%
GDPval (AA)57.5%53.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)43.1%
MirrorCode73.3%
CursorBench69.4%
ALE-Bench2143.2

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Step 5 Preview: questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Step 5 Preview?
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on quality: 72.0 vs 65.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview is cheaper: $1.43 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.