BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5 vs Dola Seed 2.0 Pro

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 59.2.
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • Dola Seed 2.0 Pro is stronger in coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
MetricClaude Fable 5 (thinking)Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
BenchLeader Index70.959.2
Agents & tools score74.1
Composite score92.2
Instruction following score63.0
Knowledge score84.9
Long context score67.7
Reasoning score90.865.5
Coding score66.1
Human preference score65.2
Maths score64.2
Multimodal score62.3
Blended price $/M$20.00
Output speed57 tok/s
Time to first answer112.3 s
Context window1M
LMArena Text1456
LMArena Hard Prompts1480
LMArena Coding1513
LMArena Vision1275
AA Intelligence Index49.6
IFBench63.5%
AA-LCR82.3%
AA-Omniscience43.3
Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.5%
SciCode (AA)61.0%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)98.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%
CritPt28.6%
GDPval (AA)54.8%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)38.1%
Analyst Agent (AA)48.8%
LMArena Maths1451
LMArena Creative Writing1402
LMArena Instruction Following1434
LMArena Multi-turn1448
LMArena Longer Queries1451

Data as of 2026-09-20. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5 vs Dola Seed 2.0 Pro: questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Dola Seed 2.0 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 59.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-20, but check the category scores for your use.