Claude Fable 5 vs Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 59.2.
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro is stronger in coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (thinking) | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.9 | 59.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.1 | – |
| Composite score | 92.2 | – |
| Instruction following score | 63.0 | – |
| Knowledge score | 84.9 | – |
| Long context score | 67.7 | – |
| Reasoning score | 90.8 | 65.5 |
| Coding score | – | 66.1 |
| Human preference score | – | 65.2 |
| Maths score | – | 64.2 |
| Multimodal score | – | 62.3 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | – |
| Output speed | 57 tok/s | – |
| Time to first answer | 112.3 s | – |
| Context window | 1M | – |
| LMArena Text | – | 1456 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | – | 1480 |
| LMArena Coding | – | 1513 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1275 |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.6 | – |
| IFBench | 63.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | – |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | – |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | – |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | – |
| CritPt | 28.6% | – |
| GDPval (AA) | 54.8% | – |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 38.1% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 48.8% | – |
| LMArena Maths | – | 1451 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | – | 1402 |
| LMArena Instruction Following | – | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-turn | – | 1448 |
| LMArena Longer Queries | – | 1451 |
Data as of 2026-09-20. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Fable 5 vs Dola Seed 2.0 Pro: questions
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than Dola Seed 2.0 Pro?
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 59.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-20, but check the category scores for your use.