BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 67.1.
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh) is stronger in maths.
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is 3.4× cheaper ($20.00 vs $67.50 per 1M blended).
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) streams 14.4× faster (57 vs 4 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Fable 5 (thinking)GPT-5.5 Pro (xhigh)
BenchLeader Index70.967.1
Agents & tools score74.1
Composite score92.1
Instruction following score63.0
Knowledge score84.9
Long context score67.7
Reasoning score90.880.1
Maths score74.5
Blended price $/M$20.00$67.50
Output speed57 tok/s4 tok/s
Time to first answer108.4 s3.5 s
Context window1M1.1M
FrontierMath Tiers 1–387.7%
FrontierMath Tier 478.0%
AA Intelligence Index49.7
IFBench63.5%
AA-LCR82.3%
AA-Omniscience43.3
Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.5%
SciCode (AA)61.0%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)98.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%
ARC-AGI-195.0%
ARC-AGI-284.2%
CritPt28.6%30.6%
GDPval (AA)56.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)38.1%
Analyst Agent (AA)48.8%
LMCA53.9%
DTBench96.0%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro: questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 67.1. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 is cheaper: $20.00 against $67.50 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 streams faster: 57 against 4 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.