Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Claude Fable 5 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 65.2.
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 6.7× cheaper ($3.00 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) streams 1.5× faster (57 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 (thinking) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 70.9 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 74.1 | 78.3 |
| Composite score | 92.1 | 79.8 |
| Instruction following score | 63.0 | – |
| Knowledge score | 84.9 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 67.7 | 66.6 |
| Reasoning score | 90.8 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $20.00 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 57 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 108.4 s | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 984k |
| AA Intelligence Index | 49.7 | 40.0 |
| IFBench | 63.5% | – |
| AA-LCR | 82.3% | 80.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 43.3 | 4.3 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 62.9% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 92.6% | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 55.5% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 61.0% | 54.0% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 98.5% | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 91.4% | – |
| CritPt | 28.6% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 56.6% | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 38.1% | 49.1% |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 48.8% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 65.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Fable 5 better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 74 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper: $3.00 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Claude Fable 5 streams faster: 57 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Claude Fable 5 accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.