BenchLeader

Claude Fable 5 vs Step 5 Preview

Verdict
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 65.0.
  • Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is stronger in agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, reasoning.
  • Step 5 Preview is stronger in long context, multimodal.
  • Step 5 Preview is 14× cheaper ($1.43 vs $20.00 per 1M blended).
MetricClaude Fable 5 (thinking)Step 5 Preview
BenchLeader Index70.965.0
Agents & tools score74.1
Composite score92.184.4
Instruction following score63.0
Knowledge score84.972.0
Long context score67.770.8
Reasoning score90.882.1
Multimodal score60.8
Blended price $/M$20.00$1.43
Output speed57 tok/s
Time to first answer108.4 s
Context window1M1M
AA Intelligence Index49.743.6
IFBench63.5%
AA-LCR82.3%88.3%
MMMU-Pro76.4%
AA-Omniscience43.316.4
Terminal-Bench Hard62.9%
GPQA Diamond (AA)92.6%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)55.5%46.5%
SciCode (AA)61.0%58.9%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)98.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%
CritPt28.6%20.9%
GDPval (AA)56.6%53.6%
τ²-Bench Banking (AA)38.1%
Analyst Agent (AA)48.8%

Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Fable 5 vs Step 5 Preview: questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Step 5 Preview?
Claude Fable 5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.9 vs 65.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Fable 5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview is cheaper: $1.43 against $20.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.