Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5 Turbo
Claude Opus 4.7 
GLM 5 Turbo Verdict
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.4.
- Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in agents & tools, coding, composite, human preference, knowledge, long context, maths, multimodal, reasoning.
- GLM 5 Turbo is stronger in instruction following.
- GLM 5 Turbo is 5.3× cheaper ($1.90 vs $10.00 per 1M blended).
- Claude Opus 4.7 streams 2.7× faster (49 vs 18 tokens per second).
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM 5 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 65.6 | 58.4 |
| Agents & tools score | 69.5 | 63.1 |
| Coding score | 64.7 | – |
| Composite score | 80.8 | 62.9 |
| Human preference score | 69.0 | – |
| Instruction following score | 59.1 | 71.8 |
| Knowledge score | 66.6 | 56.6 |
| Long context score | 66.0 | 62.4 |
| Maths score | 65.4 | – |
| Multimodal score | 65.8 | – |
| Reasoning score | 66.5 | – |
| Blended price $/M | $10.00 | $1.90 |
| Output speed | 49 tok/s | 18 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 16.4 s | 7.9 s |
| Context window | 1M | 200k |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | – |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | – |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | – |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | – |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | – |
| GSO-Bench | 44.1% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.3 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1494 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1519 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1557 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1317 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 40.7 | 26.6 |
| IFBench | 58.6% | 73.2% |
| AA-LCR | 78.7% | 71.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | 78.8% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | 27.3 | -16.4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 51.5% | 33.3% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.4% | 84.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 42.3% | 27.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 88.6% | 98.5% |
| AIME (Vals) | 96.3% | – |
| LiveCodeBench | 85.1% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 89.9% | – |
| LegalBench | 85.3% | – |
| CorpFin | 66.1% | – |
| TaxEval | 75.3% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 68.5% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 82.0% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 90.2% | – |
| Vals Index | 56.1 | – |
| HiL-Bench | 41.7% | – |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | – |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.3% | – |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5 Turbo: questions
- Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than GLM 5 Turbo?
- Claude Opus 4.7 leads on quality: 65.6 vs 58.4. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 4.7 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than GLM 5 Turbo for agentic tasks?
- Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in agentic tasks (70 vs 63 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5 Turbo?
- GLM 5 Turbo is cheaper: $1.90 against $10.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5 Turbo?
- Claude Opus 4.7 streams faster: 49 against 18 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M against 200k tokens.