BenchLeader

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.5 vs 61.2.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
  • GPT-6 Luna (max) is 40× cheaper ($0.200 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
  • GPT-6 Luna (max) streams 3.2× faster (157 vs 50 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (thinking)GPT-6 Luna (max)
BenchLeader Index70.561.2
Composite score95.073.9
Knowledge score84.463.2
Long context score68.267.5
Multimodal score71.759.2
Reasoning score95.076.1
Blended price $/M$8.00$0.200
Output speed50 tok/s157 tok/s
Time to first answer4.3 s142.6 s
Context window1M1.1M
AA Intelligence Index57.637.3
AA-LCR84.7%83.3%
MMMU-Pro87.7%75.5%
AA-Omniscience46.40.7
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)61.4%38.5%
SciCode (AA)66.9%54.6%
CritPt31.7%19.4%
GDPval (AA)67.3%43.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)59.6%12.6%
AutomationBench69.5%53.2%
GDP.pdf26.2%20.4%
MLCR16.1%
Harvey LAB91.2%
AA-Omniscience: accuracy66.2%43.8%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination41.4%23.3%
AA-Briefcase18221299

Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna: questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than GPT-6 Luna?
Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.5 vs 61.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper: $0.200 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna streams faster: 157 against 50 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.1M against 1M tokens.