BenchLeader

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.3

Verdict
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 59.5.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, multimodal, reasoning.
  • Grok 4.3 (medium) is stronger in agents & tools, instruction following.
  • Grok 4.3 (medium) is 5.1× cheaper ($1.56 vs $8.00 per 1M blended).
  • Grok 4.3 (medium) streams 2.1× faster (102 vs 48 tokens per second).
MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (thinking)Grok 4.3 (medium)
BenchLeader Index70.759.5
Composite score95.059.4
Knowledge score85.071.1
Long context score68.563.5
Multimodal score71.959.8
Reasoning score95.050.7
Agents & tools score60.0
Instruction following score80.3
Blended price $/M$8.00$1.56
Output speed48 tok/s102 tok/s
Time to first answer4.2 s13.3 s
Context window1M1M
AA Intelligence Index57.624.8
IFBench83.3%
AA-LCR84.7%75.0%
MMMU-Pro87.7%75.8%
AA-Omniscience46.416.7
Terminal-Bench Hard30.3%
GPQA Diamond (AA)89.0%
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)61.4%30.0%
SciCode (AA)66.9%
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA)91.2%
CritPt31.7%4.9%
GDPval (AA)67.3%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)59.6%
AutomationBench69.5%
GDP.pdf26.2%
Harvey LAB91.2%
AA-Omniscience: accuracy66.2%28.8%
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination41.4%83.1%
AA-Briefcase1822

Data as of 2026-09-22. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.3: questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Grok 4.3?
Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) leads on quality: 70.7 vs 59.5. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Claude Opus 5.5 (thinking) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-22, but check the category scores for your use.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper: $1.56 against $8.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
Which is faster, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 streams faster: 102 against 48 output tokens per second.
Which has the larger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens of context.