DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Verdict
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 61.9.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) is stronger in coding, long context, multimodal.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is stronger in agents & tools, composite, knowledge, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) is 11× cheaper ($0.262 vs $3.00 per 1M blended).
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) streams 5.6× faster (215 vs 38 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.9 | 65.2 |
| Agents & tools score | 59.6 | 78.3 |
| Coding score | 68.9 | – |
| Composite score | 74.5 | 79.8 |
| Knowledge score | 61.7 | 66.3 |
| Long context score | 68.5 | 66.6 |
| Multimodal score | 61.4 | – |
| Reasoning score | 69.5 | 80.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.262 | $3.00 |
| Output speed | 215 tok/s | 38 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 10.5 s | 55.2 s |
| Context window | 1M | 984k |
| LMArena WebDev | 1614 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 4.9 | – |
| LiveBench | 81.1% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 86.7% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 80.0% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 77.3% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 93.3% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.3% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 81.2% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 70.0% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 39.5 | 40.0 |
| AA-LCR | 84.0% | 80.3% |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.0% | – |
| AA-Omniscience | -5.3 | 4.3 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 93.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.3% | 42.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.9% | 54.0% |
| CritPt | 14.3% | 20.0% |
| GDPval (AA) | 56.6% | 56.4% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | – | 49.1% |
Data as of 2026-09-19. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads on quality: 65.2 vs 61.9. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ahead overall as of 2026-09-19, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B scores higher in agentic tasks (78 vs 60 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper: $0.262 against $3.00 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash streams faster: 215 against 38 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M against 984k tokens.