DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (61.3 vs 61.6).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is stronger in agents & tools, coding, instruction following, maths.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is 2.1× cheaper ($0.262 vs $0.544 per 1M blended).
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) streams 4.3× faster (221 vs 51 tokens per second).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 61.3 | 61.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 67.2 | 55.1 |
| Coding score | 48.6 | 39.6 |
| Composite score | 70.5 | 85.0 |
| Instruction following score | 76.7 | – |
| Knowledge score | 56.3 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 65.7 | 69.2 |
| Maths score | 57.3 | – |
| Reasoning score | 71.1 | 88.9 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.262 | $0.544 |
| Output speed | 221 tok/s | 51 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 10.1 s | 42.0 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 44.9% | – |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 34.3 | 46.3 |
| IFBench | 79.2% | – |
| AA-LCR | 79.7% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | -14.3 | 8.4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 35.6% | – |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 90.8% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 38.5% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 50.4% | 60.9% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | 95.0% | – |
| IOI | – | 39.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 59.5 |
| AIME 2026 | 95.8% | – |
| HMMT February 2026 | 93.9% | – |
| MathArena Apex | 27.1% | – |
| CritPt | 16.6% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 46.3% | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 39.4% | – |
| ITBench SRE (AA) | 31.5% | – |
| Analyst Agent (AA) | 25.0% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 43.0% |
| CyberBench | – | 72.9% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 57.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.1% |
| MysteryMechanism | – | 15.3% |
| ProgramBench | – | 0.5% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 68.9% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 64.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals) | – | 24.8% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.2% |
| LMCA | 35.9% | – |
| DTBench | 86.4% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 12.1% | 34.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 78.7% | – |
| AutomationBench | – | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 19.2% |
| MLCR | – | 18.3% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 40.4% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 8.3% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | – | 1522 |
Data as of 2026-09-24. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (61.3 vs 61.6). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-24, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in coding (49 vs 40 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (67 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper: $0.262 against $0.544 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- DeepSeek V4 Flash streams faster: 221 against 51 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.