Deepseek v4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Deepseek v4 Pro 
Gemini 3.1 Pro Verdict
- Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on quality: 62.8 vs 60.4.
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) is stronger in human preference, maths.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro is stronger in coding, reasoning, agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
| Metric | Deepseek v4 Pro (high) | Gemini 3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.4 | 62.8 |
| Coding score | 59.3 | 59.8 |
| Human preference score | 66.0 | 59.8 |
| Maths score | 66.2 | 60.7 |
| Reasoning score | 65.9 | 69.8 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 62.6 |
| Composite score | – | 61.5 |
| Instruction following score | – | 68.4 |
| Knowledge score | – | 64.9 |
| Long context score | – | 65.2 |
| Multimodal score | – | 65.8 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $4.50 |
| Output speed | – | 115 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 23.4 s |
| Context window | – | 1.0M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 94.1% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 59.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 26.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 95.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | – | 46.4% |
| Terminal-Bench | – | 80.2% |
| SimpleBench | – | 79.6% |
| SciCode | 46.4% | 58.9% |
| WeirdML | 46.5% | 72.1% |
| APEX-Agents | – | 33.5% |
| ProofBench | – | 26.0% |
| GSO-Bench | – | 22.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 155 |
| LMArena Text | 1462 | 1487 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1508 |
| LMArena Coding | 1505 | 1520 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | 1447 |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1295 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -5.6 |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 30.4 |
| IFBench | – | 77.1% |
| AA-LCR | – | 82.0% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 82.4% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 31.9 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 53.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 94.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 47.0% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.6% |
| AIME 2026 | – | 98.3% |
| HMMT February 2026 | – | 94.7% |
| MathArena Apex | – | 60.9% |
| MultiChallenge | – | 71.4% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 41.9% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 44.0% |
| MultiNRC | – | 64.7% |
| HiL-Bench | – | 35.3% |
| TutorBench | – | 53.0% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1142 |
| ARC-AGI-1 | – | 98.0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | – | 77.1% |
| ARC-AGI-3 | – | 0.4% |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Deepseek v4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: questions
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
- Gemini 3.1 Pro leads on quality: 62.8 vs 60.4. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Gemini 3.1 Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than Gemini 3.1 Pro for coding?
- Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher in coding (60 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).