Deepseek v4 Pro vs o3
Deepseek v4 Pro 
o3 Verdict
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) and o3 are level on quality (60.4 vs 60.5).
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) is stronger in human preference, reasoning.
- o3 is stronger in coding, maths, agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context, multimodal.
| Metric | Deepseek v4 Pro (high) | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.4 | 60.5 |
| Coding score | 59.3 | 62.0 |
| Human preference score | 66.0 | 62.3 |
| Maths score | 66.2 | 78.6 |
| Reasoning score | 65.9 | 61.5 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 68.7 |
| Composite score | – | 49.6 |
| Instruction following score | – | 63.8 |
| Knowledge score | – | 56.2 |
| Long context score | – | 60.9 |
| Multimodal score | – | 56.9 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $3.50 |
| Output speed | – | 130 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 4.4 s |
| Context window | – | 200k |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | – |
| SciCode | 46.4% | – |
| WeirdML | 46.5% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 146.9 |
| LMArena Text | 1462 | 1432 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1441 |
| LMArena Coding | 1505 | 1460 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | – |
| LMArena Vision | – | 1214 |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 20.2 |
| IFBench | – | 71.4% |
| AA-LCR | – | 74.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 70.1% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | -15.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 37.1% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 82.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 20.1% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 80.7% |
| PRBench Finance | – | 47.7% |
| PRBench Legal | – | 48.6% |
| MMMU (validation) | – | 82.9% |
| MMMU-Pro (official) | – | 76.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | – | 67.6% |
| IFEval (HELM) | – | 86.9% |
| Omni-MATH (HELM) | – | 71.4% |
| WildBench (HELM) | – | 86.1% |
| MMLU-Pro (HELM) | – | 85.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (HELM) | – | 75.3% |
| HELM Capabilities mean | – | 81.1% |
| Aider Polyglot | – | 81.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | – | 58.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (any scaffold) | – | 58.4% |
| BFCL Overall | – | 63.0% |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Deepseek v4 Pro vs o3: questions
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than o3?
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) and o3 are level on quality (60.4 vs 60.5). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; o3 is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than o3 for coding?
- o3 scores higher in coding (62 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).