Deepseek v4 Pro vs Qwen3 7
Deepseek v4 Pro 
Qwen3 7 Verdict
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (60.4 vs 60.1).
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) is stronger in human preference, maths.
- Qwen3 7 (max) is stronger in coding, reasoning, agents & tools, composite, instruction following, knowledge, long context.
| Metric | Deepseek v4 Pro (high) | Qwen3 7 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.4 | 60.1 |
| Coding score | 59.3 | 60.9 |
| Human preference score | 66.0 | 57.1 |
| Maths score | 66.2 | 57.4 |
| Reasoning score | 65.9 | 66.8 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 54.1 |
| Composite score | – | 53.5 |
| Instruction following score | – | 74.6 |
| Knowledge score | – | 62.9 |
| Long context score | – | 63.5 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $3.75 |
| Output speed | – | 166 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 17.0 s |
| Context window | – | 1M |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | – | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | – | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 77.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | – | 55.8% |
| SimpleBench | – | 70.4% |
| SciCode | 46.4% | 48.8% |
| WeirdML | 46.5% | – |
| ProofBench | – | 26.0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 153.7 |
| LMArena Text | 1462 | 1474 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1495 |
| LMArena Coding | 1505 | 1525 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | 1517 |
| LMArena Agent | – | -3.1 |
| LiveBench | – | 73.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 83.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 74.2% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 71.8% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 79.7% |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 29.9 |
| IFBench | – | 80.5% |
| AA-LCR | – | 79.0% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 13.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 50.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 92.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 40.5% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 49.5% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 94.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | – | 87.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | – | 89.3% |
| LegalBench | – | 84.9% |
| CorpFin | – | 63.7% |
| TaxEval | – | 75.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 61.0% |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | – | 68.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | – | 90.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 44.8 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | – | 1110 |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Deepseek v4 Pro vs Qwen3 7: questions
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than Qwen3 7?
- Deepseek v4 Pro (high) and Qwen3 7 (max) are level on quality (60.4 vs 60.1). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Deepseek v4 Pro (high) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Deepseek v4 Pro better than Qwen3 7 for coding?
- Qwen3 7 scores higher in coding (61 vs 59 on the category index, where 50 is average).