Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro 
GPT-6 Sol Verdict
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 68.4 vs 59.2.
- Dola Seed 2.0 Pro is stronger in human preference, maths.
- GPT-6 Sol (max) is stronger in coding, multimodal, reasoning, agents & tools, composite, knowledge, long context.
| Metric | Dola Seed 2.0 Pro | GPT-6 Sol (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 59.2 | 68.4 |
| Coding score | 66.1 | 72.3 |
| Human preference score | 65.2 | – |
| Maths score | 64.2 | – |
| Multimodal score | 62.3 | 67.2 |
| Reasoning score | 65.5 | 95.0 |
| Agents & tools score | – | 69.5 |
| Composite score | – | 74.6 |
| Knowledge score | – | 75.4 |
| Long context score | – | 67.8 |
| Blended price $/M | – | $4.00 |
| Output speed | – | 116 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | – | 136.1 s |
| Context window | – | 1.1M |
| LMArena Text | 1456 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1480 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1513 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | – | 1686 |
| LMArena Vision | 1275 | – |
| LiveBench | – | 79.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | – | 88.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | – | 81.8% |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | – | 52.9% |
| LiveBench Mathematics | – | 96.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | – | 81.2% |
| LiveBench Language | – | 85.3% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | – | 68.6% |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 47.5 |
| AA-LCR | – | 83.7% |
| MMMU-Pro | – | 83.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 27.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 47.9% |
| SciCode (AA) | – | 57.6% |
| IOI | – | 82.6% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 83.2% |
| Vals Index | – | 62.6 |
| CritPt | – | 30.9% |
| GDPval (AA) | – | 49.4% |
| BioMysteryBench | – | 74.8% |
| Code Migration | – | 57.2% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 71.5% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 49.0% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 1.7% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 28.9% |
| MedCode | – | 47.1% |
| MedScribe | – | 82.0% |
| ProgramBench | – | 2.0% |
| Public Benefits Bench | – | 56.6% |
| SAGE | – | 44.8% |
| Tax Agent Bench | – | 53.0% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 87.8% |
| LMArena Maths | 1451 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1448 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1451 | – |
| EBR-bench | – | 53.3% |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | – | 43.9% |
| AutomationBench | – | 61.6% |
| GDP.pdf | – | 24.8% |
| MLCR | – | 16.1% |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | – | 54.5% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | – | 39.9% |
| AA-Briefcase | – | 1483 |
Data as of 2026-09-24. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol: questions
- Is Dola Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Sol?
- GPT-6 Sol (max) leads on quality: 68.4 vs 59.2. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; GPT-6 Sol (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-24, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is Dola Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6 Sol for coding?
- GPT-6 Sol scores higher in coding (72 vs 66 on the category index, where 50 is average).