GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GLM 5.3 Flash 
MiMo-V2.6-Pro Verdict
- GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (63.4 vs 64.3).
- GLM 5.3 Flash is stronger in agents & tools, coding, human preference, maths, multimodal.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is stronger in composite, knowledge, long context, reasoning.
- GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.3× cheaper ($0.238 vs $0.548 per 1M blended).
| Metric | GLM 5.3 Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 63.4 | 64.3 |
| Agents & tools score | 64.3 | 55.1 |
| Coding score | 65.9 | – |
| Composite score | 59.8 | 84.8 |
| Human preference score | 67.6 | – |
| Knowledge score | 66.3 | 66.8 |
| Long context score | 65.8 | 69.1 |
| Maths score | 71.1 | – |
| Multimodal score | 65.3 | – |
| Reasoning score | 68.5 | 88.8 |
| Blended price $/M | $0.238 | $0.548 |
| Output speed | 61 tok/s | 54 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 35.7 s | 39.8 s |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| SciCode | 51.6% | – |
| APEX-Agents | 52.8% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.9 | – |
| LMArena Text | 1475 | – |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1498 | – |
| LMArena Coding | 1525 | – |
| LMArena WebDev | 1612 | – |
| LMArena Vision | 1299 | – |
| LMArena Agent | 1.1 | – |
| LiveBench | 71.6% | – |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 77.6% | – |
| LiveBench Coding | 79.0% | – |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | 56.8% | – |
| LiveBench Mathematics | 81.2% | – |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 76.4% | – |
| LiveBench Language | 77.3% | – |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.8% | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.8 | 46.3 |
| AA-LCR | 80.0% | 86.3% |
| AA-Omniscience | 7.5 | 8.4 |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 91.2% | – |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | 39.9% | 49.4% |
| SciCode (AA) | 51.6% | 60.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | – | 67.8% |
| Vals Index | – | 59.7 |
| CritPt | 15.4% | 26.6% |
| GDPval (AA) | 57.0% | 58.7% |
| τ²-Bench Banking (AA) | 47.2% | – |
| Code Migration | – | 43.0% |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark | – | 62.9% |
| Finance Agent v2 | – | 58.3% |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | – | 10.8% |
| Legal Research Bench | – | 47.1% |
| Terminal-Bench Science | – | 2.9% |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | – | 85.2% |
| LMArena Maths | 1513 | – |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | – |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1471 | – |
| LMArena Multi-turn | 1475 | – |
| LMArena Longer Queries | 1476 | – |
| BTF-3 | 14.9% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA) | 32.8% | 34.9% |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (AA) | 84.3% | – |
| AutomationBench | 60.4% | 58.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 15.4% | 19.2% |
| MLCR | 51.1% | – |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | 33.2% | – |
| AA-Omniscience: accuracy | 27.5% | 34.9% |
| AA-Omniscience: non-hallucination | 72.4% | 59.4% |
| AA-Briefcase | 1459 | 1522 |
| AA Openness Index | 44.4 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-23. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: questions
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- GLM 5.3 Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are level on quality (63.4 vs 64.3). The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; MiMo-V2.6-Pro is ahead overall as of 2026-09-23, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for agentic tasks?
- GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher in agentic tasks (64 vs 55 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper: $0.238 against $0.548 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GLM 5.3 Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
- GLM 5.3 Flash streams faster: 61 against 54 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.0M against 1M tokens.