GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3 6
GLM 5.3 
Qwen3 6 Verdict
- Qwen3 6 (max) leads on quality: 61.6 vs 60.0.
- GLM 5.3 (max) is stronger in coding, human preference, reasoning.
- Qwen3 6 (max) is stronger in agents & tools, knowledge, maths, composite, instruction following, long context.
- GLM 5.3 (max) is 1.4× cheaper ($2.15 vs $2.96 per 1M blended).
| Metric | GLM 5.3 (max) | Qwen3 6 (max) |
|---|---|---|
| BenchLeader Index | 60.0 | 61.6 |
| Agents & tools score | 52.8 | 67.1 |
| Coding score | 64.3 | 58.1 |
| Human preference score | 68.9 | 65.8 |
| Knowledge score | 55.8 | 62.6 |
| Maths score | 60.0 | 64.2 |
| Reasoning score | 66.9 | 63.1 |
| Composite score | – | 59.1 |
| Instruction following score | – | 71.2 |
| Long context score | – | 64.5 |
| Blended price $/M | $2.15 | $2.96 |
| Output speed | 66 tok/s | 59 tok/s |
| Time to first answer | 33.5 s | 37.0 s |
| Context window | 1M | 246k |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 87.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 | 68.8% | – |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 29.3% | – |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 91.1% | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch) | – | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.0% | 52.0% |
| Terminal-Bench | 41.8% | – |
| SimpleBench | – | 63.0% |
| SciCode | 56.5% | – |
| WeirdML | 75.4% | – |
| ProofBench | 49.0% | – |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | – | 149.3 |
| LMArena Text | 1486 | 1460 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1509 | 1481 |
| LMArena Coding | 1526 | 1509 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1614 | 1479 |
| LMArena Agent | 2.6 | – |
| AA Intelligence Index | – | 28.4 |
| IFBench | – | 76.6% |
| AA-LCR | – | 80.7% |
| AA-Omniscience | – | 9.2 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | – | 43.9% |
| GPQA Diamond (AA) | – | 88.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam (AA) | – | 30.8% |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (AA) | – | 95.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 80.5% | – |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.8% | – |
| IOI | 68.4% | – |
| LegalBench | 84.8% | – |
| CorpFin | – | 66.5% |
| TaxEval | 72.4% | – |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 71.5% | – |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 95.4% | 72.8% |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 88.1% | – |
| Vals Index | 57.0 | – |
Data as of 2026-09-13. Best configuration of each model; every score links to its source on the model pages.
GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3 6: questions
- Is GLM 5.3 better than Qwen3 6?
- Qwen3 6 (max) leads on quality: 61.6 vs 60.0. The BenchLeader Index combines every independent quality benchmark; Qwen3 6 (max) is ahead overall as of 2026-09-13, but check the category scores for your use.
- Is GLM 5.3 better than Qwen3 6 for coding?
- GLM 5.3 scores higher in coding (64 vs 58 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Is GLM 5.3 better than Qwen3 6 for agentic tasks?
- Qwen3 6 scores higher in agentic tasks (67 vs 53 on the category index, where 50 is average).
- Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Qwen3 6?
- GLM 5.3 is cheaper: $2.15 against $2.96 per million tokens, blended at three input tokens per output token.
- Which is faster, GLM 5.3 or Qwen3 6?
- GLM 5.3 streams faster: 66 against 59 output tokens per second.
- Which has the larger context window?
- GLM 5.3 accepts more context: 1M against 246k tokens.